Nuclear physicists are growing more confident that practical fusion energy could become a reality by the 2030s, according to a new Medium feature by Brian Bergstein, the former executive editor of MIT Technology Review. The piece traces the history of modern fusion research and finds that with the underlying theory largely settled, engineers are now working through the remaining engineering and financial obstacles.
Christofer Mowry, CEO of General Fusion, offered the most optimistic and concrete timeline in Bergstein's reporting. "I'm 100 percent confident that this is going to happen," Mowry told Bergstein. "Are we going to have commercial fusion power plants on the grid by 2030? Maybe. But it won't be 50 years, I can tell you that." Mowry hopes to have a prototype up and running by 2022.
Smaller Reactors, Replaceable Parts
MIT engineer Dennis Whyte and his colleagues have moved away from the gargantuan facilities that typically house fusion reactor prototypes, according to Bergstein, and are instead working toward small-scale reactors better suited for practical use than experimentation. They have also figured out how to implement replaceable parts so the devices do not need to be rebuilt when a component breaks.
Many of the remaining challenges are incremental engineering hurdles, along with financial ones such as finding a government willing to invest in the process. Bergstein describes Mowry as the industry expert with the most optimistic and concrete timeline for developing practical nuclear fusion reactors.
Widespread nuclear fusion could power the world without greenhouse gas emissions and with minimal waste, according to the source. It would provide reliable energy without requiring the environmentally taxing battery networks that solar and wind farms need to maintain power when the sun goes down or the wind stops blowing.
Fusion is still off in the distance, and the engineers' optimism should be taken with a shaker of salt, the source notes. But if scientists working on it believe prototypes could be up within the next three years, the long-standing "50 years away" benchmark may finally be giving way to a firmer timetable.
Editorial Notes